- Apr 5, 2012
- 3,192
- 212
Hi all I want to discuss something little that may be bothering some people;
First of all if any of you come from the Japanese Hip-Hop forum Ongaku Eternal you may be familliar with the issue.
Anyway, it's about the "J-x" label: e.g. J-pop, J-trance, J-Hip-Hop etc. etc.
(Of course it's not only Japanese art, it could also be Korean, etc.
What I particularly am quite intrigued by is the assumption that if something is "J-", it's not taken as seriously as it should be in a global scale.. I mean of course sometimes in the music shop or whatever, it's classified "English pop", "French Rap", and so on, but I'm talking not as a matter of classification (although sometimes in the shop you do see the classification "international music"), but here, I'm talking as a matter of music genre. Why don't we just find out that whoever the Japanese artist is comes from Japan, the same way we find out Immortal Technique is from the U.S.
Reggae doesn't have to be Jamaican to be reggae right? Then why not just label "J-Rock" to just "Rock"? I don't know but it seems kind of unfair to me. As said by the original poster in Ongaku Eternal, the label "J-x" tends to make people focus on the "J" part and not the actual genre. I think in a way this can also help "globalise" international music anymore, who knows we'll see your favourite Japanese artist perform locally in your area (though I doubt that is bound to happen anytime soon)
I don't know, this is just my opinion. My arguments probably suck really hard; I'm not really someone who can communicate socially as easily as others - but I hope you catch my drift. Discuss what you think, why you would agree/disagree to this. Be polite (O'ω'o)
First of all if any of you come from the Japanese Hip-Hop forum Ongaku Eternal you may be familliar with the issue.
Anyway, it's about the "J-x" label: e.g. J-pop, J-trance, J-Hip-Hop etc. etc.
(Of course it's not only Japanese art, it could also be Korean, etc.
What I particularly am quite intrigued by is the assumption that if something is "J-", it's not taken as seriously as it should be in a global scale.. I mean of course sometimes in the music shop or whatever, it's classified "English pop", "French Rap", and so on, but I'm talking not as a matter of classification (although sometimes in the shop you do see the classification "international music"), but here, I'm talking as a matter of music genre. Why don't we just find out that whoever the Japanese artist is comes from Japan, the same way we find out Immortal Technique is from the U.S.
Reggae doesn't have to be Jamaican to be reggae right? Then why not just label "J-Rock" to just "Rock"? I don't know but it seems kind of unfair to me. As said by the original poster in Ongaku Eternal, the label "J-x" tends to make people focus on the "J" part and not the actual genre. I think in a way this can also help "globalise" international music anymore, who knows we'll see your favourite Japanese artist perform locally in your area (though I doubt that is bound to happen anytime soon)
I don't know, this is just my opinion. My arguments probably suck really hard; I'm not really someone who can communicate socially as easily as others - but I hope you catch my drift. Discuss what you think, why you would agree/disagree to this. Be polite (O'ω'o)