Do people here make a point of using the absolute worst file-hosting sites?

[hhops2p]

Do people here make a point of using the absolute worst file-hosting sites?

 

[failedwebsite]

Do people here make a point of using the absolute worst file-hosting sites?

What are those 'worst sites' and why are they bad?

 

[hhops2p]

What are those 'worst sites' and why are they bad?

Sites like Rapidgator require a premium account; otherwise, they are unusable.

 

[failedwebsite]

Sites like Rapidgator require a premium account; otherwise, they are unusable.

Yeah, that site should be a banned filesharing host here - it allows downloads from paid users only.

It's hard to keep up with the changes in how those sites are run though - Rapidgator going strictly premium is a recent development, I believe.

 

[anabel]

Yeah, that site should be a banned filesharing host here - it allows downloads from paid users only.

It's hard to keep up with the changes in how those sites are run though - Rapidgator going strictly premium is a recent development, I believe.

Rapidgator isn't a strictly premium site, it in fact does allow free downloads. But there are two types of files, one is premium-only files - meaning only premium members can download them; two is the normal files that anyone can download for free.

I don't know the criteria that decide which file belongs to which category (because their UI and speed is atrocious, I don't use that site more than necessary), but from what I've seen it depends on file size and the uploader's decision.

It's a "it can't be helped" case. Rapidgator links live very long. Premium links more so. All other hosts die one way or another and it's a hassle to get files re-uploaded. Some uploaders don't even reupload anything upon request, at all. So it's either you get a link that's alive or nothing.

Tbfh I'd rather take rapidgator than the buzzheavier host that's been popular recently. Those links die in less than a week, if you can't download and store everything quickly you gotta pester someone to re-upload it, it also leads to the situation where there are so many topics you'd think we have a lot of content available, but when you check it's all dead links..

 

[hhops2p]

Rapidgator isn't a strictly premium site, it in fact does allow free downloads. But there are two types of files, one is premium-only files - meaning only premium members can download them; two is the normal files that anyone can download for free.

I don't know the criteria that decide which file belongs to which category (because their UI and speed is atrocious, I don't use that site more than necessary), but from what I've seen it depends on file size and the uploader's decision.

It's a "it can't be helped" case. Rapidgator links live very long. Premium links more so. All other hosts die one way or another and it's a hassle to get files re-uploaded. Some uploaders don't even reupload anything upon request, at all. So it's either you get a link that's alive or nothing.

Tbfh I'd rather take rapidgator than the buzzheavier host that's been popular recently. Those links die in less than a week, if you can't download and store everything quickly you gotta pester someone to re-upload it, it also leads to the situation where there are so many topics you'd think we have a lot of content available, but when you check it's all dead links..

The fact is that there are hosting services that have been around longer and also provide good download speeds.
as an example: vik1ngfile , pixeldrain, mediafire , gofile , workupload and others
These aren't the best hosting services out there, but at least they're honest: downloads don't cut off at the 80% or 90% mark, and the speeds are decent—you don't have to spend hours downloading just a single gigabyte. Plus, they offer generous limits for non-premium users.
And yet, users here seem to deliberately choose hosting services that focus on premium plans; but I don't want to buy a premium plan for just one or two files that don't even exceed 3 GB.
Sorry for my English.

 

[caducus]

I think a lot of it has to do with what's available for free.

For example, the two sites I use are mediafire and mega, but there are some definite limitations. A free account with mediafire gives you 10GB - it's great for smaller files because the links last a long time. But if you're using a free account, 10GB can fill up very quickly, depending on what you're hosting. Also, media has a habit of going through what's in your account and marking off certain things as:

Mega is nice because it gives 20GB which is a little better, but again - 20GB can fill up very quickly depending on what you're hosting, and how much. Additionally, there is a daily limit to upload/download, although you can usually side-step that with a VPN.

But for people who are uploading a LOT of content on a regular basis... 30GB is nothing. I imagine they use whatever sites are available that they can access through free accounts.

 

[hhops2p]

I think a lot of it has to do with what's available for free.

For example, the two sites I use are mediafire and mega, but there are some definite limitations. A free account with mediafire gives you 10GB - it's great for smaller files because the links last a long time. But if you're using a free account, 10GB can fill up very quickly, depending on what you're hosting. Also, media has a habit of going through what's in your account and marking off certain things as:

View attachment 119741

Mega is nice because it gives 20GB which is a little better, but again - 20GB can fill up very quickly depending on what you're hosting, and how much. Additionally, there is a daily limit to upload/download, although you can usually side-step that with a VPN.

But for people who are uploading a LOT of content on a regular basis... 30GB is nothing. I imagine they use whatever sites are available that they can access through free accounts.

Many data transfer limits imposed by various websites can easily be bypassed using a VPN; while those who download or upload massive amounts of data might want to consider a premium account, such users are rare. Most people—myself included—only occasionally need to download files up to 20 GB in size, which falls within limits that are often refreshed daily. Large video or photo archives, as well as "heavy" games, are frequently split into parts available from different sources, making them easy to download—especially when using a VPN.

 

[anabel]

Also, media has a habit of going through what's in your account and marking off certain things as:

View attachment 119741

I've had this happen to some files in my account too. The links still work when I log out and check, I've had other people I share with confirm it as well, so I don't understand what effect this has exactly...?

My files are password protected so it's more baffling when it happens. Just goes to show we have zero privacy or data protection when it comes to those online services. Not that I'm surprised, but it's an annoyance when you need a reliable host and every site has their own caveats.

 

[caducus]

Many data transfer limits imposed by various websites can easily be bypassed using a VPN; while those who download or upload massive amounts of data might want to consider a premium account, such users are rare. Most people—myself included—only occasionally need to download files up to 20 GB in size, which falls within limits that are often refreshed daily. Large video or photo archives, as well as "heavy" games, are frequently split into parts available from different sources, making them easy to download—especially when using a VPN.

You're kind of missing the point, I think? Your original question asked if people here make it a point to use the worst file-hosting sites, and while "worst" is subjective, my response offered a reason why people might use file-hosting sites that you might not like.

For someone who uploads content on a regular basis, it's VERY easy fill up 20GB. 5 or 6 video files at 3-4 GB each and that free mega account is completely full. And sure, an uploader probably isn't going to burn through it in a single day - but it really doesn't take long to run out of space if you're regularly sharing new content.

At that point, do you take down the original files you're hosting to upload new ones? The pages where you offered those links still exist, and people will likely ask you to reupload - which you'll then have to take something else down for to make room for the re-up. Or do you turn to other free hosting sites that aren't as good, but will offer you a free account with some additional space so you can - in theory - host more? At what point do you run out of the "good" sites, and then have to dip into the "okay" or "worst?"

Anyway, if someone is taking the time and consideration to share something with me that I would not otherwise have access to, I can't really be grumpy about the service they utilize to do so. I am essentially getting access to something they spent their money on for free, which leaves me very grateful. I'm not entitled to their stuff. And I'm definitely not entitled to their stuff at a premium download speed

 

[caducus]

I've had this happen to some files in my account too. The links still work when I log out and check, I've had other people I share with confirm it as well, so I don't understand what effect this has exactly...?

My files are password protected so it's more baffling when it happens. Just goes to show we have zero privacy or data protection when it comes to those online services. Not that I'm surprised, but it's an annoyance when you need a reliable host and every site has their own caveats.

It really IS baffling. Like, sir, my file is named "af-2.zip" and is password protected. Where exactly are the red flags you're seeing, because you shouldn't even be able to OPEN it??