AI in anything that involves creative direction feels extremely low-effort, and like it's only there to make money off people who don't know any better. I believe everyone should have the right to consciously choose not to support AI, so, as much as I'd love to combat it in any way and prevent people from wasting resources on straight-up slop, it's just sad to see how AI usage often goes uncredited.
There are cases where you'd never know unless the studio admitted it, and that feels especially predatory towards consumers. I myself decided to stop supporting Voltage and their games because of their use of AI in RBL (no idea if they addressed it in any way though, I'd love to know!). If they can't even be transparent about that, it just makes you wonder what else they're using AI to generate instead of creating actual meaningful stories with the help of real people.
I don't care if it speeds up the process or makes things more efficient. If you were able to do it before without AI, then clearly you're either choosing to be lazy or hoping to make a quick buck off people's hobbies. Every usage in creating something that people pay real money for should at least be mentioned in some way.
