• Happy New Year 2026! 🎉🌟 May this year bring new desires, deeper bonds, and unforgettable moments. If destiny hasn’t brought love to your door just yet, we've got you covered all year long.
  • Malware detected from member's upload: We have received a credible report potential CryptoMiner from jekson5865's upload. Please check if you had downloaded from this member. Full details here. マルウェアがメンバーのアップロードから検出されました: @jekson5865のアップロードから、潜在的なCryptoMinerの存在について信頼できる報告を受け取りました。もし、このメンバーからダウンロードした場合は、確認をお願いします。詳細については、こちらで確認できます。检测到来自成员上传的恶意软件: 我们已收到来自@jekson5865上传的报告,指出存在潜在的CryptoMiner。请检查您是否下载过该成员的文件。完整详情请点击这里查看。
[MENTION=96703]Nexusshark[/MENTION]; I tested a random file from the range you specified and it turned out to be still working fine. :surprised: Please note that inaccurate reports won't be handled due to time and bandwidth constraints - just verify with the link checkers in my signature which files are actually dead (note: "offline" in FileFactory terms means temporarily unavailable and is not going to be replaced) and come back to me with that. :runhappy:
 
It's true though. I'm not making this up. You probably tried one of the few still working ones. But I tried Ep 60 and then I tried the Special. I tried typing the URL in and it says the Download-Link is invalid. JD can't find the files either and says they're offline. According to JD the only ones that are NOT 100% offline are Ep 14, 17, 23, 24, 29, 31, 32, 36, 42, 48, and 49. The rest says unknownFileName status offline.
 
[MENTION=96703]Nexusshark[/MENTION]; Links replaced. :samuraihero:
Also, don't use JD to verify the link status. It has a tendency to be quite inaccurate. Use the link checked from my signature instead.
 
THX. Links are working again. Though JD's status analysis seemed to be pretty accurate. Because I checked the links manually AND via JD leading to the same result. Now that you replaced the links, downloads are working fine, both manually and via JD.
 
THX. Links are working again. Though JD's status analysis seemed to be pretty accurate. Because I checked the links manually AND via JD leading to the same result. Now that you replaced the links, downloads are working fine, both manually and via JD.
I've been doing this for a while now and I can tell you with complete certainty that JD's detection mechanism failed and in the past and is going to fail in the future.
 
I'm not saying that JD's detection mechanism is 100% accurate. And I'm not questioning your own experience with it. All I'm saying is that from MY experience whenever a download was not working via JD, it didn't work by any other means either. I know, because I tried.
 
[MENTION=107704]ElizabethLiones[/MENTION]; Links replaced. :samuraihero:
 
[MENTION=79989]RecklessGreed[/MENTION]; Links replaced. :samuraihero:
 
All RG links are dead if you can please re upload when you have time.

Thank you so much!
 
I'm not currently accepting requests. Also, this is not the request forum. :P
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest profile posts

cocojumbo wrote on Ryzen111's profile.
rip_no wrote on Nihonjaki90's profile.
Could you update RJ01274691 to the Jun 12, 2025 version? Thank you.
tintin0821 wrote on Ryzen111's profile.
Could you please re-upload this?
https://www.anime-sharing.com/threads/1646084/
Thank you.
Jhutt wrote on Shine's profile.
Do you have the latest update for RJ01492838? Cuz it doesn't work with RJ01042589 ver 3.04. Thanks in advance!
aoi_tenziku wrote on Shine's profile.
Could you update RJ01318417 to the Dec 30 2025 version?
Thank you for the update.