Dark Angel
Reaction score
102,242

Joined
Last seen

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About Post areas

  • Hmm..Those prices are nice for all that your getting.

    Personally, I'd go for the D7200. One of my friends is a wedding photographer and he uses the same camera. It's works brilliantly.
    Great performance with low light (in my opinion) with very little noise, even it higher ISO values.

    I'm not really familiar with Pentax brand camera's so I don't know much in that regard.

    What is your main purpose in photography? As in, what will you be photographing a lot? I myself am into Macro, Night and Landscape photography ^^
    Yoo~ Sorry again for late reply =[

    Hmm... The camera and all the accessories look good but I still think 550 is bit high up for a second hand DLSR. Something around 500 sounds reasonable to me.
    Although, I'm not familiar with second-hand items so this is just a personal opinion from me.

    Yea, I'm very satisfied with my D5100. It's my first DSLR and does everything I wanted and expected to do. I own it for about 3 years now and according to Nikon I've made about 12.000 clicks. Which is not much at all imo.
    Yeah. The standard night mode can only help so much, and it's near useless if there's no helpful light source nearby from which it can concentrate light into. Though, as I mentioned earlier, I'm in no way savvy with photography equipment, so I can't give you much feedback there. I know the brands, but not the specific makes and models. From how it sounds, though, the difference sure sounds worth it. Especially since 200 euros isn't a big deal in the world of spending thousands on both the cameras and the lenses.
    So can you make me a wallpaper? I wll send you the renders can you mix them up with multiple elements to make a wallpaper?

    Thank you!
    :hi: it's been some time since last time we talked.

    If you are interested please can yu rend me some images that i will send by pm?

    Thank you!
    Personally I wouldn't buy second-hand items either, maybe with few exceptions and only if the previous user is someone I know personally and could trust. It's also true for cameras with as they have a limited lifespan. Your choice sounds better, anyway, though don't forget to get a lens of an equal quality too. I'd say two flash sources are already enough unless you do a static set in a studio room or something, so yeah, that sounds good.
    Sorry for the late reply. Yeah, for professional photographers or even enthusiasts with spare cash, phone cameras will never replace real cameras. Besides, I think it was only recently that newer phone cameras started introducing standard features related to photography such as depth of field. Phone cameras are coming along fast, but they still have a long way to go.

    Wow, 4 flash sources at the same time? That's some serious lighting; I guess it's intended for outdoor uses or basically replicating full-fledged studio lighting in a more portable way. Shows just how much I'm following photography stuff, though-I didn't even know cameras were using wifi signals to communicate with peripherals. As for clicks, yeah, that sounds like what I've read about it. Basically, until a certain amount of clicks, the camera should be 100% fine (barring physical damage). After that, though, there's a chance of the camera breaking that keeps increasing as the clicks increase. That's what makes the ultimate breaking point different for every person. Like even between 200,000 to 500,000 or maybe over a million...

    It's nice to see that you've found yourself a new hobby. Really nice timing, too, considering you said you were starting to lose interest in signature making and Photoshopping in general. Hope you immerse yourself well in it, but don't overspend :P And that looks like a nice site, I'll keep in mind, thanks~
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…